Carrier vetting
Reviewing a New Carrier When the Public History Is Short
By VerifyCarrier · · 3 min read
A new carrier may have few inspections, no published safety rating and little history in a broker’s systems. Those gaps limit the evidence; they do not establish either safety or fraud. Review the current entity, authority, insurance and shipment arrangements, then apply the brokerage’s policy to what remains unknown.
Distinguish the business from its people
An experienced owner or driver can establish a new operating entity. Their experience may explain the business’s background, but it does not transfer another company’s authority, insurance or safety history to the new carrier. Identify the entity that will contract for and perform the haul.
Use official registration and authority dates rather than inferring age from the size of a USDOT or MC number. FMCSA’s registration modernization includes randomized new identifiers. A low or high number is not a reliable substitute for a dated record.
Sources: FMCSA: Registration changes in Motus
Understand the New Entrant program
FMCSA monitors applicable new interstate motor carriers through an initial 18-month New Entrant period. The program assesses basic safety-management controls and uses inspections and other interventions to monitor performance. Passing the safety audit does not end the remaining monitoring period.
The audit and a published federal safety rating are different pieces of evidence. If a carrier supplies an audit result, verify the document and read the result in its own terms. Do not translate it into a rating the agency has not assigned or an assurance about every future shipment.
Sources: New Entrant Safety Assurance Program; What happens after passing the audit; FMCSA: Safety fitness determinations
Read small samples honestly
Zero recorded inspections is not the same observation as several inspections without recorded violations. Likewise, one out-of-service finding among two inspections produces 50 percent, but the rate rests on two observations. Record the count, category and period before deciding what the result contributes to the review.
Check that a blank field is actually a retrieved blank. A failed lookup, missing source, unsupported dataset and record with no rating are different conditions. If the source is unavailable, resolve that failure before treating it as a description of the carrier.
Verify the parts that can be verified now
Confirm the legal entity and current authority for the proposed operation. Confirm insurance for the commodity, value, equipment and dates through an independently established insurer or authorized agent. Establish the dispatch contact and the connection between the approved company and the truck expected at pickup.
FMCSA’s fraud guidance recommends independent phone checks and matching the arriving truck’s name and numbers to the contracted carrier. These checks address the current transaction even when a long statistical history does not yet exist. They do not manufacture the missing history.
Sources: FMCSA: Insurance filing requirements; FMCSA: Broker and carrier fraud and identity theft
Make exceptions explicit
If the brokerage requires a minimum operating history, follow its approval process rather than quietly overriding the rule because the rate is attractive. If an exception is permitted, document who approved it, which evidence they relied on, the scope of the approval and what must be rechecked.
For a legitimate carrier unable to satisfy a requirement, explain the specific missing evidence or policy condition and the route for reconsideration. “Rejected” gives the carrier no way to correct an administrative discrepancy. A clear reason also prevents the next broker from restarting the same unresolved review.
Sources checked . Procedures are VerifyCarrier’s recommendations; examples are illustrative. How we prepare and correct these guides.